Jenny Everywhere's Infinite: Quark Time

The New Adventures of The Shifter
RSS
‹
  • About
  • We Recommend
  • Cast

No Comic Yet

by ArdRhi on January 16, 2012 at 12:09 pm
Posted In: Blog

Sorry, folks, due to circumstances beyond my control (as in the “oh my sweet and fluffy Lord, please give me more pain meds”), this week’s comic isn’t ready yet.  It is STARTED, but not DONE.  I may post a filler sometime this week and have this week’s story comic up for next week, so as to stay in sync.  Philadelphia suddenly remembered that it has winter weather, and the cold, wet, and clammy weather we had last week laid me low.  I will do my best to have a new story page for next week.

I do this for the love of it, remember, and I want to enjoy doing it, so I’m not going to push myself and start hating it.

  Comment

Get The Point?

by ArdRhi on January 10, 2012 at 12:52 pm
Posted In: Blog
Quietest Classroom Pencil Sharpener

Classroom Friendly Supplies' Quietest Classroom Pencil Sharpener

It has been quite a while since I’ve done a review of a product, and nothing in extreme detail. But amidst my various lessons and independent studies of drawing and penciling, I found that there’s something fundamental you simply can’t do without: a way to sharpen your pencils. There are probably as many different schools of thought on pencil sharpening as there are artists, and possibly as many as there are pencils, but I found two major categories, and a few minor ones.

Use a pocketknife, or use a dedicated sharpener, were the two major categories.

My father was the “pocketknife” category, and I’ve certainly sharpened my share of pencils using a pocketknife, from homework assignments (I grew up in those bad old days when a kid with a knife was probably just whittling something, not whittling his or her friends…though in my neighborhood, that was still an option even in my day) to those big, chunky carpenters’ pencils in the theater scene shop.  The latter you nearly always had to sharpen with a pencil, since at the time, finding a dedicated sharpener for one was a head-scratcher. Now, they make one that fits in a drill-chuck.  Also sharpens regular pencils, and comes with a bucketful at hardware stores, but I think it comes under the Maxim #37 heading of drawing tools.

In the “dedicated sharpener” heading, you’ve got different types of sharpener and a choice of point: The standard plastic or metal “wedge”, with a conical hole in it and a little blade that shaves down the wood and graphite into the desired cone, wedges encased in a box to retain shavings — less messy, crank-type mechanical sharpeners with a burr blade like the kind many of us will remember from school, mounted on the wall near the door, and electric sharpeners of various — and sometimes dubious — durability, strength, speed, cost, and duty cycle.

That leaves point type.  Most sharpeners out there either make a very shallow cone, which is generally well-suited for writing, or a middle-length cone that produces a fairly-sharp point good for writing, durable, and good enough for general sketching. But if you’re going to be doing fine penciling, or want to do shading that makes use of the side of the lead, you’ll want a very long, sharp, and strong point. That means the wood needs to be shaved back very steeply, to make a long cone, and the graphite inside likewise carefully shaved without making a narrow, brittle point that will break when you use it. A pencil-rendering technique I’ve been studying that makes use of a very long, sharp point is Darrel Tank’s “5-Pencil Method”. Unfortunately, none of my pencil sharpeners on hand would make a satisfactory long point.  A set of Cretacolor “Monolith” woodless graphites came with a KUM-brand caseless wedge that produces a fair medium-length point, but I didn’t like it.  Not only wasn’t the point long enough, the thing was messy to use. So I looked for an alternative.

KUM makes a two-step cased handheld wedge that first shaves the wood, then sharpens the graphite, but I didn’t want another little plastic handheld sharpener, at a cost, plus shipping, of about $15.  Darrel Tank recommends an X-Acto brand electric sharpener, but I looked at the reviews on Amazon and wasn’t impressed. Many electric sharpeners seem to be plagued with failures, due to small plastic gears or linkages breaking and no replacement parts being available.  The motors and cases are heavy-duty, but expensive sharpeners become landfill because of the failure of a two-cent plastic gear.  Pass.  That leaves hand-cranked sharpeners, like the kind used in classrooms.  Most make either short or medium length points suitable for writing or general use. Many are noisy.  Many sacrifice durability and precision in order to handle a wide variety of pencil sizes, with an adjustable gauge.  Many are expensive.  The “Quietest Classroom Pencil Sharpener“, by Classroom Friendly Supplies, is none of these.

This sharpener is a delight to use. Put simply, this sharpener is gorgeous.  Not to look at, it’s basically a metal box with a crank on one side, a hole on the other, and a little drawer on the bottom for shavings. It’s so simple, it’s elegant. The colors are blue or green. The drawer is clear plastic. It’s made of steel.  There’s very little to break or go wrong, but if something does, you can fix it, usually without even touching a tool.  It is a self-feeding sharpener.  This means you pull a little guide out from the side of the sharpener body, squeeze a lever to open the jaws inside the hole, slide your pencil all the way in until it stops, then let the jaws close.  The jaws hold firmly, and might leave a little crunch mark on the side of your pencil, but it’s not even as bad as if you chew it, so don’t worry about it.  Then you turn the crank. The guide pulls the pencil in for you while you turn. You can clearly feel and hear when your cranking isn’t doing anything more to the pencil, so you stop. It only takes about ten seconds; if it takes a dozen turns, your pencil was really dull. Then you release the jaws, the guide slides back up to the sharpener body, and you remove your pencil with a beautiful, long point on it. No muss, no fuss.

The sharpener lists for $19.95, with free shipping. It came to me in a cute little plastic box (see picture), padded in an Express Mail carton with crumpled newspaper.  It included a single sheet of instructions and a small, L-shaped mounting bracket in a bag.

You’ll find a small 1/4″ hole at the bottom edge of the sharpener body, front and back, to accommodate the bracket end — loosen the plastic nut and slide the bracket over a convenient shelf or table edge, tighten, and it will be held fairly rigidly. The company suggests, and I believe, that this bracket is not a very secure way to hold the sharpener in place. I have used these brackets before on other items and this is almost always the case for this type of bracket. The instructions suggest simply holding the sharpener with one hand while cranking with the other, or hot-gluing the base to a shelf.  I held mine down.  It took little effort.  I strongly suggest this method, since it allows you to easily reposition it, and you won’t suddenly find your sharpener flying, the shaving drawer falling out and spilling because the bracket came loose during use.

I typically use five kinds of pencils: Faber-Castell drawing pencils, Cretacolor Monolith woodless graphites, The General’s #555 Layout pencils, Dixon Tri-Conderogas, and whatever disposable .05 mechanicals happen to be cheap — those are of course irrelevant in this instance. Right off the bat, the Dixon Tri-Conderogas, probably the most comfortable writing pencil I’ve ever used, will not fit in this sharpener because the pencil’s diameter is too large. That’s no big deal, I prefer a short length point on the Tri-Conderogas anyway.

Before I get a lot of comments about “a pencil is a pencil”, let me go all Barney Fife on that and nip it in the bud.  First, I’m just learning to draw by hand. I see a lot of conflicting stuff in the lessons about what to get, what’s good, what you need, so I have stuff I probably don’t need, and will eventually outgrow. Second, I’m developing my own style over time and am getting to like certain tools, some better than others. Third, one set of lessons, the 5-Pencil Method, relies on layering different pencil grades to get its effect. I may only use parts of this technique in the long run.  Lastly, it’s irrelevant what I use for the purposes of this review — what’s important is what others use, will this device sharpen them, and how well?

In this picture, you can see the points of a Faber-Castell 4H, a Cretacolor Monolith HB, and a General’s Layout #555, which is about a 2B hardness.  As you can see, the wood is shaved back in the case of the Faber-Castell and the General’s in a long and tapering cone, and all three have a very long and sharp graphite point that is not concave near the end.  It is not needle-sharp, so it won’t damage the drawing surface at first touch, but is still very clean and well-pointed.  I tested each of these points with moderate force at a 45-degree angle against a cardboard surface, and they did not snap off. The only concern I had was that, after sharpening the woodless graphite, the burr blades were very dirty and required cleaning with a paper towel. Sharpening a wooden pencil after sharpening a graphite left the sharpened wood of the subsequent pencil covered with loose, powdery graphite which could conceivably fall onto a drawing and smudge it if unnoticed.

Easy To Clean

Thankfully, cleaning the sharpener is simple. The crank and blade unit comes out of the sharpener body by twisting the black plastic collar counter-clockwise until it loosens. Then it is carefully withdrawn, cleaned, reinserted and tightened again.  The crank itself can be removed, but I had no real reason to do so, but this would make blade replacement simple. The website has replacement blades, should they be necessary.

This sharpener is called the “Quietest”, and though I don’t have another sharpener handy to compare it to, it is very quiet. Even when sharpening a solid graphite stick with no wood, it barely made a muted grinding sound, and that was when I had the unit resting on a hollow plastic box (my drawing supplies box) as a support. This box served as a superlative resonating chamber, and it was still quiet. I doubt it will be obtrusive in any environment, unless you hook it to an amplifier or rest it on a kettle drum.

Will this sharpener help disabled persons in particular sharpen pencils?  I believe so. I doesn’t require a large amount of dexterity or physical strength to use. If mounted firmly, using the bracket or an alternate method, it only requires two hands briefly, to insert a pencil while holding the jaws on the feed mechanism open. I didn’t try, but you might be able to do that with one hand, with practice. All other operations can be performed with a single hand if the unit is fastened down. It produces exceptional points for drawing that make work easier.  If work is easier, and tools are better suited to the task, stress is reduced. Most disabilities, IMHO, benefit from a reduction in stress. I know mine does.

Most importantly, this sharpener makes me happy. It works. It isn’t fancy, it doesn’t have lights, you don’t plug it in, it isn’t space-age, it doesn’t try to do everything for everyone, it just sharpens pencils very well with a good, long point and does it very quietly.  It does what I want it to do, doesn’t do anything I don’t want it to do, and doesn’t have a USB port or a sticker warning me that “pencils may be sharp” and to be careful not to hurt myself with them.

It’s just what I wanted.

└ Tags: 5-Pencil Method, burr blade, Classroom Friendly Supplies, Cretacolor Monolith, Dixon Tri-Conderoga, Faber-Castell, General's Layout, KUM, long-point sharpener, Quietest Classroom Pencil Sharpener, self-feeding, X-Acto
1 Comment

Happy New Year Blog Post

by ArdRhi on January 1, 2012 at 8:01 pm
Posted In: Blog

Happy New Year!!!  Out with 2011, in with 2012!

As someone I know once said, “Hey, cool, that’s, like, my favorite Rush album!”  I let him live.

No, don’t bother looking up to see the new comic, because there isn’t one yet.  It’s in the works, but it’s coming along slowly for several reasons.  One, as far as I’m concerned, it’s still the holidays.  My partner Maggie is still home on vacation for them, it’s still the holidays, so I’m relaxing.  Two, I’ve been fighting a cold, and when I have a bug, I get moody and cranky and several other dwarves and don’t want to do anything stressful, so the page I’ve started isn’t done.  But rest assured, I have the base art for at least  8 more pages shot and ready to process, so I have plenty to work on.

But that doesn’t mean I’ve just been sitting back for the past two weeks, playing Star Wars: The Old Republic.  Well…not just that.  (It’s fun.)

I’ve also been working on my drawing.  I’m slowly reading my way through my Bridgman and Loomis.  I took a few lessons over at Drawspace, but I wasn’t getting what I wanted out of it, so I looked around a bit, and found another site for something called the “5-Pencil Method”.   I watched some of the videos out of curiosity, and it’s remarkably good.  The techniques will mesh well with the Bridgman and Loomis material, and with what I learned from Rod Ramos, giving me a lot of good grist for my own mill.  I also received a lesson from a friend of mine who’s a fan of the comic and an artist himself.  We did it over Skype in a video conference, which was different and interesting.  I learned some new stuff about the construction of the neck and shoulders that made a lot of sense.

I’ve tried a number of new drawing tools, and experimented with some old items that I had lying around from other uses.  I have a set of Faber-Castell drawing pencils that are quite nice, if a tad lightweight.  They just feel like a stick of balsa wood in my fingers, insubstantial.  But they hold a good point, are of consistent quality, and don’t sharpen to nothing before achieving a point.   A set of Creatacolor Monolith “woodless” graphite pencils are very nice, but they are all in the softer “B”- range, none in the harder “H” range.  I wish they made a 2H and 4H in the woodless variety, but I haven’t found a manufacturer that makes anything harder than an HB.   I did find that my favorite writing pencil, a Dixon Tri-Conderoga, in a #2/HB, works very well as a general-purpose sketching pencil, with a very middle-of-the-road hardness and good consistency.  The triangular cedar shaft is easy to hold, and the non-skid coating make it comfortable to use.

The only thing I didn’t get before was a decent sharpener. I didn’t realize there was a difference in the length of point until I started working with them in different ways, and noticed that the sharpeners I had on hand were very short point sharpeners, and what I really needed was a long point sharpener.  So I’m looking into the sharpener issue.  I do have a small magnesium KUM long-point wedge that came with the woodless pencils, but it’s hard to use and messy.  I don’t like the reviews of the electric sharpeners I’ve been seeing — too many little plastic gears that break.  So it’s research time.  Maybe something more later.

The only thing I don’t have a good solution for yet is the drawing board situation here at my recliner. Moving to a table isn’t an option.  I may need to go back to the lap desk I had found that fits into the chair.  We’ll see.

  Comment

A Few Words On The Honorable Acceptance of Wisdom

by ArdRhi on December 2, 2011 at 10:58 am
Posted In: Blog

I did a sketch last night, the first after the lesson I got at  the Allentown Comic Con, and it turned out fairly good, I think.  But I also got an email from a writing group I used to belong to, and it got me thinking about the nature of criticism, and how two very different styles of critique affected me.

I’d like to compare and contrast, for a moment, two diametrically opposed experiences.  Each involves being given criticism of my work by a professional — someone who has sold significant volumes in the profession — by my own request.  Neither of them just walked up to me out of nowhere and started giving me advice, I asked them for it, and they gave it to me.

First off, I consider it very valuable and considerate of any pro to take a portion of their time, which represents a salable commodity, to teach me anything. I do appreciate it.  They’re sacrificing time they could be using to create something to make themselves some money in order to give me advice.  That’s very kind of them, and I recognize that for what it is.

I’m going to leave out names, because while one of these is complimentary, the other, unfortunately, is not, and I don’t want to identify that person lest he feel embarrassed. It’s not my intention to do that, it’s my intention to make a very general statement on the subject of critique, and why we do it in the first place. It would just be mean to poke at this person by name, so I’m not going to do that.  You’ll probably know who the positive one is anyway, but that’s ok, I don’t mind if the positive one is identified, that shouldn’t cause any harm.  That said, here’s the comparison:

I once belonged to a writers’ group with  a number of members that got together every couple of months to read over short stories or novel excerpts and offer critiques of each others’ work.  The process was fairly simple: A couple of weeks before the gathering, send a PDF of what you want critiqued to a central email address, and it would be distributed so everyone attending would have an opportunity to read it. Copies would be provided at the session, but reading it ahead of time was a good idea. Then we’d all show up at the designated member’s house, have some takeout food, and sit around and go round-robin style, taking turns giving our impressions of the work. It was generally very useful, with lots of good input, catching plot and character flaws, pacing problems, and stuff that just doesn’t work. Note the operative word — “generally”.

There was one member of the group, a published author of some local note (I never read any of his work), who seemed to derive a great deal of pleasure from being the group’s own little Simon Cowell. He didn’t seem to have the words “constructive criticism” in his vocabulary. He would let seven, eight people tell you “I like this, your characters are well-made and solid, I identify with them, the plot moves right along, you only have this little difficulty with this image of the tree…it just doesn’t seem to fit here, can you refine it?”, then wades in with something like “This was just awful.  Frankly, I don’t know why you bother.  If it were mine, I’d trim it down to a hundred words and make a Feghoot of it, or better yet, just stick it in a drawer and forget about it.”

This is typical of his sort of criticism. Not how to improve the work, but just tearing the creator down and belittling them.  I tried going to this group many times, one stretch of about a year, the second about seven months, but this person’s continuous toxicity made the experience so painful I eventually stopped going entirely.

Compare this to the more recent event, where I received a critique of a quick sketch by a pro comic artist, who, rather than immediately saying “dear God, that looks like crap!” — which, honestly, would have been accurate –

First Sketch

he said “I didn’t know my head was that round…but you did capture my energy.  Let me get a pencil, and I’ll show you a few techniques.”  He then spent half an hour — occasionally looking over at his table to see if he had a customer — to basically teach me how to draw.  He suggested books for me to read, and we parted with me effusively grateful. Even though he still essentially thought my original sketch wasn’t very good.  It was the same assessment of the work — but a radically different response.  I was glad for this response. It left me better off than when I started.

I have a fairly thick skin when it comes to insults, and I know how to accept criticism graciously, but there’s an unsubtle line between criticism and abuse, between teaching and tormenting.  A teacher encourages you to join them up where they are — a tormentor wants you to stay down below, so they can continue to step on you.  The same exact input can be treated with two diametrically opposing methods, one resulting in discouragement, the other in resolve.

When I did the sketch above, I didn’t really know what to draw at first. I didn’t feel up to a life drawing yet, but didn’t want to draw fruit. So I looked around, and the trackball was handy.  It had interesting curves and shadows. So I tried it, and it came out pretty good. I surprised myself.  For the first time, I think I can really do this.

└ Tags: constructive, criticism, drawing, lessons
1 Comment

Things are looking up

by ArdRhi on September 4, 2011 at 9:03 pm
Posted In: Blog

Just a quick note.

I have been undergoing a new treatment called Beta Reset that has been very promising.  It has not removed the source of my physical pain, but it has helped me cope with it a bit better, by retraining my pain threshold and how I perceive pain.  I’ve got a bit more endurance and a little less general aching, so that’s a good thing.  We’ll see how it hangs in over time, and what I need to do to maintain it.  The downside was that it took me away from my studio for two days this week, so once again, I’m behind.

But this behind is a better sort of behind. I have an on-arc story page in the works, one of the 8 remaining in the volume.  That means I need to get cracking on a new print version, doesn’t it? YES! I have all of the base art ready and one panel completed, and two partially done (out of six).  I hope to have this one done by sometime Tuesday, but don’t hold me to it, it’s a holiday weekend and I haven’t been myself lately.  I may have to adjust the update day at this rate.  Maybe change it to Wednesday.  We’ll see.

I need to get a new ergonomic keyboard.  The Microsoft Natural Keyboard isn’t cutting it — not enough incline to the keys to relieve tension on my wrists.  I’m used to a SafeType keyboard, where the typing surfaces are vertical instead of horizontal, and a flat keyboard just plain hurts.  But I went through two SafeTypes in two years, and that’s just too much money too quickly.  So I’m looking at the Comfort Keyboard System, this truly scary creation with the keyboard in three sections on adjustable pedestals with gearlike, toothed wheels to set their positions.  It’s no cheaper than a SafeType, but it has a 2 1/2-year warranty and is supposed to durable as all get out.  We’ll find out.

Also, I have to inform you that The Non Con had to do an emergency name change.  It is now The DigiCon (www.thedigicon.com).  It’s still next weekend, and I’m still going to be one of the online guests.   Turns out “non-con” has a negative connotation in some types of fan fiction that we won’t get into, thank you VERY much, because that sort of thing just isn’t discussed in polite company.  You may look it up if you wish.  But suffice to say, it had nothing to do with this convention, and the organizers wished to distance themselves, rightly so, from this alternate meaning.

└ Tags: Beta Reset, Comfort Keyboard System, The DigiCon
1 Comment
  • Page 2 of 6
  • «
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • »
  • Last »

Archives

©2010-2013 Jenny Everywhere's Infinite: Quark Time | Powered by WordPress with ComicPress | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑